# Fairvisor vs. AWS API Gateway Throttling

URL: https://fairvisor.com/compare/aws-api-gateway/

---


 Fairvisor vs. AWS API Gateway Throttling See Fairvisor with AWS deployment patterns The Situation AWS API Gateway throttling is easy to use inside AWS and works well for standard request-rate limits.
Fairvisor is designed for AI-aware enforcement: token and cost budgets, loop protection, and policy dimensions beyond API keys.
Comparison Capability Fairvisor AWS API Gateway Rate limiting Token bucket + cost-based + token-based (TPM) Token bucket (requests only) Limit keys Any JWT claim, header, path, User-Agent API key, usage plan Cost-based budgets Yes, per-org, per-user, per-endpoint No AI-specific features Loop detection, token counting, circuit breaker No AI crawler protection User-Agent detection + rate limiting No Multi-cloud Runs anywhere AWS only Latency profile In-process, low-latency decision path Managed gateway policy path Shadow mode Yes No Analytics Built-in dashboard, CSV export CloudWatch raw metrics Pricing model OSS edge + optional SaaS plan Managed service pricing by AWS plan/usage Vendor lock-in None AWS ecosystem Offline operation Yes No When to Use Fairvisor You need AI-aware rate limiting and cost-based budgets. You need multi-cloud or self-hosted deployment flexibility. You want to avoid per-request pricing at high volume. When to Use AWS API Gateway You are all-in on AWS. You need managed gateway features (auth, transformations, WebSocket). Request-based throttling is enough for your use case. Use Them Together Use AWS API Gateway for routing and auth. Add Fairvisor as policy decision layer for advanced enforcement. Keep AWS convenience while adding AI-specific protection controls. Need more than request-per-second throttling? See Fairvisor with AWS deployment patterns